![]() Though lots are running UCCNC on very cheap PC’s these days too, like $200 mini pc’s. So you can get away with dredging up a piece of junk from the scrap heap for a control. That said, in the right hands LinuxCNC is really capable, and it can be run for cheap because the hardware requirements are basically nil. And because I make money with my machine I’d rather have real support than have to deal with a community forum. ![]() LinuxCNC is great, but I just get tired of dealing with Linux. I pretty much prefer UCCCNC at this point, it’s absolutely better than M3/4. I’ve also used M4, LinuxCNC, and most recently UCCNC. I’ve used M3 very extensively and understand its limitations very well. It just seems to be a necessity for using the software. ![]() TO get M4 really working you are looking at doing some programming in LUA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |